Tag Archives: rights

CIRA Bylaw and Governance Changes

Recently, CIRA announced it has proposed key changes to its bylaws. Of particular concern is the way board members are selected. Read on to see my letter to the corporation.

The public consultations on this matter are open until May 2 — tomorrow. I urge you to submit your comments to CIRA today if you have not done so already. To submit comments, e-mail governance@cira.ca before May 2. Visit http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6451/135/ and http://cira.ca/legal/governance/ for more background.

UPDATE: Thanks to clarification from CIRA Chair, Paul Andersen, I see that I have misinterpreted the wording on the full slate of candidates. The reference to that in my letter is lined through.


To: CIRA Board Members

This message is to express my feedback regarding proposed changes to the CIRA bylaws.

Most notably, there are changes in the bylaws that remove the ability for people to run for a director or advisor position of the CIRA board without being on a slate assembled (presumably) by the existing board.

I strongly oppose this change, along with the running of a full slate, rather than individual candidates in board elections. As well, I oppose the provision for board directors to appoint other directors — even temporarily. This proposed structure and process lacks the accountability and transparency required to govern such an important public institution in the public interest. It sets the stage for an environment where only insiders are able to hold positions on the CIRA board and dramatically reduces CIRA members’ power to express confidence (or lack thereof) in board members individually or even as a group.

The make-up of the CIRA board is important, not only because of how important the corporation is, but because it is vital Canadians and the world have confidence in the legitimacy of it. Under proper governance, CIRA can be an exemplar for other similar organizations around the world to follow but in order for that to be, the board has to be taken seriously. Transparency and public confidence are prerequisites for legitimacy in boards of our public institutions.

I understand that the current CIRA board desires a more efficient process for selecting board members. Democracy, while not as efficient as the alternatives, is the only way to ensure accountability and proper governance of the CIRA board. Any changes to the CIRA bylaws must go substantially further in maintaining the integrity and legitimacy of the board than the current proposal, rather than degrade such integrity and confidence.

If you have any questions or comments for me on this matter, please feel free to contact me.

Thank you and best regards,

Mike Toscano

Canadian Copyright Consultations

There has been a lot of talk in Canada and elsewhere about our copyright law and if/how it should be changed. I recently responded to the federal government’s request for public input. I would have liked to say more to them about this but I thought it best not to turn the consultation to a dissertation. :)   They posed five questions pertaining to issues of copyright. See my answers below and if you have an opinion on this, you can even weigh in by visiting http://copyright.econsultation.ca/topics-sujets/show-montrer/18 and submitting your answers to the questions there via the e-mail address provided.

How do Canada’s copyright laws affect you? How should existing laws be modernized?

First, I am not yet convinced such laws need to be changed. Canada’s copyright laws affect all Canadians. We all read books, visit web sites, enjoy music, films, and so forth. If laws do need to be changed in any way, it should be though feedback from Canadian consumers (as with this survey and other forms of feedback); artists, and authors, as well as experts on copyright, such as Michael Geist (www.michaelgeist.ca). Copyright law should not be written or changed according to any demands from CRIA, the RIAA, MPAA, or the US government but rather exclusively according to the best interests of Canadian consumers.

Based on Canadian values and interests, how should copyright changes be made in order to withstand the test of time?

Unfortunately, it is likely impossible copyright laws can be written to still be relevant many years from now. Times change and legislation needs revisiting from time to time. Thirty years ago, who could have predicted the mass adoption of technologies present today such as the Internet (in its present form), digital media, and MP3 players, and the capabilities they bring to people?

What sorts of copyright changes do you believe would best foster innovation and creativity in Canada?

I believe an open and flexible system with an emphasis on Creative Commons (or similar) (http://creativecommons.ca/ , http://creativecommons.org/) licensing. Prices should be kept low, restrictions on material, such as DRM should be discouraged or outlawed, and consumer rights such as fair use should be tantamount.

What sorts of copyright changes do you believe would best foster competition and investment in Canada?

We must create a climate where information is easily and cheaply available and available in the forms consumers would like to use it in. Technology should be embraced — not fought — as the new, efficient medium for storing and transmitting media such as music and film. Thanks to the power of the Internet, artists no longer need to be discovered and “get signed.” They can now publish their own music themselves and keep more of the proceeds than if they entered a contract with a record label. Most importantly, artists retain all the rights to their work when they publish content themselves instead of turning ownership of their material over to a record company. If the entertainment industries are permitted to continue on their current trajectory as I suggest, artists will earn more money and rights, consumers will have better quality, cheaper products and more rights, the marketplace will have much needed healthy competition, and there will be many small yet successful businesses involved instead of a few giant ones. Corporate record and film companies know this and that is why they are fighting tooth and nail to eliminate competition and innovation as much as they can. Their continued dominance depends on continued use of an obsolete monopolistic system where they hold all the power. The major record labels have run into problems lately not because of a lack of tools available to them but because of a failure to leverage the ones they had. The market fundamentally changed and they failed to act and meet market demands. When they did act, they did horribly — how could a practise of suing your customers (as was done by the RIAA in the US) not end badly?

What kinds of changes would best position Canada as a leader in the global, digital economy?

To be a leader in the global, digital economy, we must embrace current and innovate new technology; completely embrace freedom for individual people and operate according to their best interests (not those of corporations or their interest groups); and we need to be in touch with consumer needs and trends so we can continue to lead in the future by accommodating those needs.

Mike